|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Astarte Nosferatu
House Nosferatu Sani Khal'Vecna
|
Posted - 2006.12.04 10:13:00 -
[1]
December dividend payout: (based on the EvE-mail ISS shareholders get when dividend get's paid)
ISS Marginis - 2.376.709.324 ISS Providence - 1.133.592.443 ISS Borealis - 793.533.020 ISS Cassini - 501.608.531
With the current growth of the EvE economy, and the increasing maturity of our financial and corporate system, perhaps it's time to start thinking about building one of each race type Outpost in the same constellation in one of the eight new regions? Doing that in multiple constellations in multiple regions would work too . At least build some Minmatar Outposts in the new regions, people are going to want to refine the drone loot.
Anyways, keep up the good work, and keep the dividends flowing .
|
Astarte Nosferatu
MBN Holding Corporation
|
Posted - 2007.01.01 23:55:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Astarte Nosferatu on 01/01/2007 23:55:40 January results:
ISS Borealis: 549.304.942 isk ISS Cassini: 459.806.258 isk ISS Marginis: 2.600.899.690 isk ISS Providence: 1.388.496.818 isk
January's dividends show a steady increase in income for ISS Marginis and ISS Providence, while ISS Borealis and ISS Cassini keep dropping in revenue. Perhaps a new direction is needed to make ISS Borealis and ISS Cassini profitable again?
|
Astarte Nosferatu
MBN Holding Corporation
|
Posted - 2007.01.03 11:50:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Motivated Prophet
Originally by: Ramblin Man It's a legit and complete answer from my point of view: "No, capital ship losses and this war do not effect shareholders. Is there any reason why they should?"
Yes. Because if, for example, ISS offers a discount on dreads to in-alliance corps, that's a missed opportunity cost--i.e., a missed bit of profit.
MP
But it helps more ISS members in Capital Ships, whereas the members had to pay 100% of the Capital Ship cost, there would be a substantial part of the members that simply couldn't afford a Dreadnaught or Carrier, thus less members would be able to contribute to the effective defence of the outposts.
There's a subtle balance between profit and effeciency, the only thing we can ask for is that ISS leadership aims for that balance, which I think they will if they are serious about ISS continued survival.
|
|
|
|